I've got a date on my estate down in Hades



occupyonline:

We spend only about 5% of the federal budget on the nonworking poor.

The Republican primary field has recently decided to revive the Welfare Queen trope, perhaps in hopes that a bit of that old Reagan magic will rub off on them. The argument, as usual, is that there’s a vast stream of federal money going to people who are sitting on their asses eating Cheetos instead of going out and earning a living instead. 

 

So CBPP decided to add up the numbers and figure out how much money the federal government spends on the nonworking poor. The answer: about 10% of all federal welfare spending. How did they come up with that? CBPP’s methodology uses Census data to figure out exactly where program dollars are going, but you can get pretty much the same answer using a simpler, easier-to-understand technique. Step One is to list every federal welfare program. Step Two is to deduct spending on the elderly, blind, and seriously disabled. That’s Social Security, Medicare, SSI, and about two-thirds of Medicaid. Step Three is to deduct spending that goes to the working poor. That’s unemployment compensation, EITC, and child tax credits. Step Four is to add up the rest. This overstates how much goes to the nonworking poor, since these programs are open to both working and nonworking families, but it gives you a rough idea.

It comes to about $235 billion, the bulk of which is SNAP (formerly food stamps) and about one-third of Medicaid. That’s 12% of all federal welfare spending and about 6% of the whole federal budget. Once you account for the fact that some of these program dollars go to the working poor, you end up with CBPP’s estimate of 10%, or about 5% of the whole federal budget.

Is that too much? I guess you have to decide for yourself. But I’ll bet most people think we spend a lot more than 5% of the federal budget on this stuff. 

(Source: motherjones)

12:07 pm, reblogged by gothicegg
permalink


Notes
  1. vampirefinch reblogged this from angrybrownbaby
  2. notunlikethecomet reblogged this from angrybrownbaby
  3. tamaraleach reblogged this from angrybrownbaby
  4. acekwright reblogged this from angrybrownbaby and added:
    Looking at this breakdown, unless I’m reading this chart wrong, the programs they are including in the study include...
  5. angrybrownbaby reblogged this from karnythia
  6. someotherchick reblogged this from strugglingtobeheard
  7. zelda-fistgerald reblogged this from stfuhatemongers
  8. vagrantthought reblogged this from stfuhatemongers
  9. ladyetherea reblogged this from brittnylouwho
  10. dorothyinengland reblogged this from stfuhatemongers
  11. matsushitayuya reblogged this from sanityscraps
  12. lucyzephyr reblogged this from sanityscraps
  13. fictionaladyfeels reblogged this from sanityscraps
  14. brittnylouwho reblogged this from sanityscraps
  15. sanityscraps reblogged this from stfuhatemongers
  16. stfuhatemongers reblogged this from pretzlcoatl
  17. ceepolk reblogged this from strugglingtobeheard
  18. storybook reblogged this from strugglingtobeheard
  19. pretzlcoatl reblogged this from strugglingtobeheard
  20. strugglingtobeheard reblogged this from cupcakesnotbombs
  21. tallpawl reblogged this from ilovecharts
  22. samimoofle reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  23. resmc reblogged this from sanaa-tamir
  24. sanaa-tamir reblogged this from note-a-bear
  25. navigatethestream reblogged this from so-treu
  26. beckyh2112 reblogged this from darkpuck
  27. cupcakesnotbombs reblogged this from so-treu
  28. 14kgoldnyc reblogged this from rosa--sparks
  29. 4dbutterfly reblogged this from karnythia